Imperial Ideology and Provincial Loyalty in the Roman Empire by Ando, Clifford - 2000

University of California Press, 2013-08-29. Paperback. Used: Good.

Paperback / softback. New. The Roman empire remains unique. Although Rome claimed to rule the world, it did not. This title argues that the longevity of the empire rested not on Roman military power but on a gradually realized consensus that Roman rule was justified.

University of California Press. Near Fine in Very Good+ dust jacket. 2000. First Edition. Hardcover. 0520220676 . A few tiny chips to DJ else fine. ; xxi, 494pp.; Classics and Contemporary Thought; 494 pages; The Roman empire remains unique. Although Rome claimed to rule the world, it did not. Rather, its uniqueness stems from the culture it created and the loyalty it inspired across an area that stretched from the Tyne to the Euphrates. Moreover, the empire created this culture with a bureaucracy smaller than that of a typical late-twentieth-century research university. In approaching this problem, Clifford Ando does not ask the ever-fashionable question, Why did the Roman empire fall? Rather, he asks, Why did the empire last so long? Imperial Ideology and Provincial Loyalty in the Roman Empire argues that the longevity of the empire rested not on Roman military power but on a gradually realized consensus that Roman rule was justified. This consensus was itself the product of a complex… Read More

University of California Press. Fine in Near Fine dust jacket. 2000. Hardcover. 0520220676 . One small chip to DJ else Fine. ; Classics and Contemporary Thought; 1.57 x 9.37 x 6.31 Inches; 494 pages; The Roman empire remains unique. Although Rome claimed to rule the world, it did not. Rather, its uniqueness stems from the culture it created and the loyalty it inspired across an area that stretched from the Tyne to the Euphrates. Moreover, the empire created this culture with a bureaucracy smaller than that of a typical late-twentieth-century research university. In approaching this problem, Clifford Ando does not ask the ever-fashionable question, Why did the Roman empire fall? Rather, he asks, Why did the empire last so long? Imperial Ideology and Provincial Loyalty in the Roman Empire argues that the longevity of the empire rested not on Roman military power but on a gradually realized consensus that Roman rule was justified. This consensus was itself the product of a complex… Read More

Berkeley,, 2000. First Edition. Hardback. Dust Jacket.. Fine in fine dust jacket. May show some very slight shelf wear but content fine and unread. � . Large 8vo. pp xxi, 494. Original publisher's black cloth, lettered silver on spine. ISBN: 0520220676

Univ of California Pr, 2013. Paperback. New. 494 pages. 8.75x6.00x1.50 inches.

Hardback. New. The Roman empire remains unique. Although Rome claimed to rule the world, it did not. In approaching this problem, the author asks, Why did the empire last so long? It argues that the longevity of the empire rested not on Roman military power but on a gradually realized consensus that Roman rule was justified.

University of California Press, 2000-10-02. Hardcover. New. New. In shrink wrap. Looks like an interesting title!

Univ of California Pr, 2000. Hardcover. New. 1st edition. 494 pages. 9.00x6.25x1.50 inches.

University of California Press, 2013-08-28. paperback. New. 6x1x9. Brand New Book in Publishers original Sealing